Hubert Kario <hka...@redhat.com> writes: >to be pedantic, the RFC describes itself "a profile" while in reality it >modifies the protocol in a way that will make it incompatible with "vanilla" >TLS 1.2 implementations
>to be pedantic, the RFC describes itself "a profile" while in reality it >modifies the protocol in a way that will make it incompatible with "vanilla" >TLS 1.2 implementations Oh, right. Well that's easily fixed, I used "profile" because I couldn't think of a better term, the best I could come up with is "plan", but it's not really a plan either. If people think "plan" is better than "profile", and it deals with Russ' objection, I'll change it to that. Alternatively, if you can think of a better term than "plan", let me know (or forever hold your peace :-). Peter. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
