On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> On 25/08/16 03:34, Tony Arcieri wrote: > I guess there's sometimes value in those die-die-die RFCs. Given that > we have RFC7525/BCP195 [1] that already has a SHOULD NOT for effective > key sizes less than 128 bits, one could argue that the IETF has covered > that to a reasonable extent, in terms of RFCs saying to not do that. Yes, aside from the 64-bit block size the the 112-bit (or sometimes 108-bit) key sizes are also notable for 3DES -- Tony Arcieri
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
