On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 5:15 PM Peter Gutmann <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz> wrote: > > In all the rush to jump on the bandwagon, no-one has yet answered the question > I posed earlier: For anyone who's already moved to TLS 1.3 the draft is > irrelevant, and for people who have to keep supporting TLS 1.2 gear more or > less indefinitely it makes their job hard if not impossible.
How does a feature freeze make it impossible to keep supporting TLS 1.2 as is? > So what's the > point of this draft? For TLS 1.3 it's just workgroup posturing which I don't > have a problem with (I was on the PKIX WG for years, that was practically in > their charter), but for ongoing TLS 1.2 use it's going to pointlessly make > life difficult for anyone working in that area. > > Why is this draft even a thing? > > Peter. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls -- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
