I did not add that the stem cells they use at the hospital in Panama come from 
your own fat cells and cord blood, not embryonic stem cells. It is 10 
injections total 2 in an IV and 8 in your spine. I am going to wait for Dr. 
Kerr to get approval from the FDA. I know it could be worse, and I don't want 
to chance that!




________________________________
From: "tmic-digest-requ...@eskimo.com" <tmic-digest-requ...@eskimo.com>
To: tmic-dig...@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 9:20:00 PM
Subject: tmic-digest Digest V2009 #190



-----Inline Message Follows-----

tmic-digest Digest                Volume 2009 : Issue 190

Today's Topics:
  Re: Fw: [TMIC] stem cell (OT?)        [ Jim Lubin <jlu...@eskimo.com> ]
  Re: [TMIC] stem cell (OT?)            [ Lawrence King <we4king...@verizon.n ]
  Re: [TMIC] blood, tissue, organ dona  [ <gor...@earthlink.net> ]
  RE: [TMIC] blood, tissue, organ dona  [ "Margaret Monson" <mag...@telus.net ]


-----Inline Message Follows-----

The problem I have with defining "life" as Gunny has as not beginning until 28 
days after conception (the joining of the male sperm and the female egg) is 
that once conception occurs the zygote contains all of the genetic information 
(DNA) necessary to become a child. Half of the genetic information comes from 
the mother’s egg and half from the father’s sperm. The zygot continues to 
divide, creating an inner group of cells with an outer shell. This stage is 
called a blastocyst. The inner group of cells will become the embryo, while the 
outer group of cells will become the membranes that nourish and protect it.

To me it makes sense the "life" begins at conception, as a single cell zygote, 
since at that point it contains everything to make a unique, individual and 
continues to divide on it's own. It happens without "brain".

Embryonic stem cell come from the blastocyst stage 4–5 days post fertilization, 
at which time they consist of 50–150 cells. 

Every biology reference I have found talks about the beginning of life being 
the union of the two gametes, the male and female reproductive cells of any 
species.

Jim

I suggest reading, Declaration On The Production And The Scientific And 
Therapeutic Use Of Human Embryonic Stem Cells
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdlife/documents/rc_pa_acdlife_doc_20000824_cellule-staminali_en.html
 




----- Original Message ----- 
From: bgunny7...@aol.com 
To: gbthomas8...@sbcglobal.net 
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 11:18 AM 
Subject: Re: [TMIC] stem cell (OT?)


In a message dated 3/25/2009 11:06:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
gbthomas8...@sbcglobal.net writes: 
Our former president, George W. Bush, so direspectfully referred to on this 
list as "dumdum," was simply against the use of our tax money for embryonic 
stem cell research in consideration for those opposed, on moral grounds, to the 
use of aborted fetuses. Stem cell research  was not stopped.  It has widely 
been proclaimed  (even on this "list") that adult stem cell research has 
actually been more successful than embryonic cell research



-----Inline Message Follows-----

tAs a mother who conceived (the natural way) 6 times but only gave birth to 2 
live infants I feel qualified to remind the greater community that every 
successful conception does not equal a child born even in natural 
circumstances, much less conceptions that occur in a dish. 

I mourned each one of those miscarriages as a child lost even after my 2nd 
child was born and I knew in my heart that my family was complete and that I 
was done with the baby stage of my life.   My experience also led me to the 
conclusion that a life that cannot survive outside the mother is not entitled 
to citizenship rights equal to that of the mother until it is mature enough to 
survive once the umbilical cord is cut (or has turned 18, which ever comes 
first).

When I got my drivers license I asked for an organ donor sticker and informed 
my parents of my wishes in the event of my death.
As a parent I could be called upon to make a similar decision should a child of 
mine suffer a life ending tragedy...  that the purpose of his or her short life 
can take on new meaning by giving life to others.  

whether you consider them blastocysts or babies, the couples who conceived them 
have already made the decision that they will never be born and have a 
meaningful purpose outside the petri dish.  I truly believe the "parents" 
should have the right to decide the fate regarding the use of their unused 
fertilized egg's stem cells as well.

Just as Jehovah's Witnesses refuse blood transfusions on the basis of their 
beliefs, each one of us has the right to refuse any treatment we are 
uncomfortable with.  but as for me, I donate blood (4 gallons),  gave a sample 
to the bone marrow registry and if Dr. Kerr can use my middle aged eggs to heal 
others then he is welcome to them.



Mindy the Artist


The problem I have with defining "life" as Gunny has as not beginning until 28 
days after conception (the joining of the male sperm and the female egg) is 
that once conception occurs the zygote contains all of the genetic information 
(DNA) necessary to become a child. Half of the genetic information comes from 
the mother’s egg and half from the father’s sperm. The zygot continues to 
divide, creating an inner group of cells with an outer shell. This stage is 
called a blastocyst. The inner group of cells will become the embryo, while the 
outer group of cells will become the membranes that nourish and protect it.

To me it makes sense the "life" begins at conception, as a single cell zygote, 
since at that point it contains everything to make a unique, individual and 
continues to divide on it's own. It happens without "brain".

Embryonic stem cell come from the blastocyst stage 4–5 days post fertilization, 
at which time they consist of 50–150 cells. 

Every biology reference I have found talks about the beginning of life being 
the union of the two gametes, the male and female reproductive cells of any 
species.

Jim

I suggest reading, Declaration On The Production And The Scientific And 
Therapeutic Use Of Human Embryonic Stem Cells
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdlife/documents/rc_pa_acdlife_doc_20000824_cellule-staminali_en.html
 




----- Original Message ----- 
From: bgunny7...@aol.com 
To: gbthomas8...@sbcglobal.net 
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 11:18 AM 
Subject: Re: [TMIC] stem cell (OT?)


In a message dated 3/25/2009 11:06:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
gbthomas8...@sbcglobal.net writes: 
Our former president, George W. Bush, so direspectfully referred to on this 
list as "dumdum," was simply against the use of our tax money for embryonic 
stem cell research in consideration for those opposed, on moral grounds, to the 
use of aborted fetuses. Stem cell research  was not stopped.  It has widely 
been proclaimed  (even on this "list") that adult stem cell research has 
actually been more successful than embryonic cell research

Not necessarily aborted fetus's. Embryonic stem cells can be grown in a petri 
dish simply by marrying a male sperm with a female egg. It has nothing to do 
with an abortion at all. Adult stem cells have already been programmed, which 
are taken from an adult human, to make that persons body. When taken, they are 
cleaned by a process known as plasma pheresis, then reinjected into that same 
person. An embryonic stem cell has NOT been programmed to make anything yet. It 
can be coaxed to do so where an adult cannot. An embryo is considered just that 
because it does not become a fetus until it is infused with blood. That process 
doesn't happen until twenty eight days after conception, and, it has no brain. 
Taking that into consideration, it is not alive. It can become so if implanted 
into a female uterus, but not until. So, in all actuality, it just sits in that 
petri dish doing absolutely nothing. I hope this gives you better insight as to 
what an embryonic
 stem cell is. 
  
Gunny
----
Jim Lubin               
jlu...@eskimo.com
http://makoa.org/jim 
disAbility Resources: http://www.makoa.org






-----Inline Message Follows-----




Re:  ".... I donate blood (4 gallons),  gave a sample to the bone marrow 
registry........."
 
I am interested that you give blood and bone marrow.  I was told I could no 
longer donate because, although my TM was considered idiopathic (don't know 
what caused it), the possibility that it was an autoimmune factor led them to 
nix me as a blood donor as well as concerns about tissue and organ donation - 
with the exception of the corneas I believe.  
 
I haven't explored it since then and it has been ten years.  Maybe things have 
changed.  Can you enlighten me to the discussions you may have had concerning 
allowed donation?  Thanks.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Lawrence King 
To: tmic-list@eskimo.com 
Cc: Lawrence King 
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [TMIC] stem cell (OT?)

Re:  ".... I donate blood (4 gallons),  gave a sample to the bone marrow 
registry........."

-----Inline Message Follows-----


I, too, donate blood through the Red Cross in Canada with no problems.
 
Margaret
 
From:gor...@earthlink.net [mailto:gor...@earthlink.net] 
Sent: March-25-09 6:59 PM
To: Lawrence King; tmic-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [TMIC] blood, tissue, organ donation
 
 
Re:  ".... I donate blood (4 gallons),  gave a sample to the bone marrow 
registry........."
 
I am interested that you give blood and bone marrow.  I was told I could no 
longer donate because, although my TM was considered idiopathic (don't know 
what caused it), the possibility that it was an autoimmune factor led them to 
nix me as a blood donor as well as concerns about tissue and organ donation - 
with the exception of the corneas I believe.  
 
I haven't explored it since then and it has been ten years.  Maybe things have 
changed.  Can you enlighten me to the discussions you may have had concerning 
allowed donation?  Thanks.
----- Original Message ----- 
From:Lawrence King 
To:tmic-list@eskimo.com 
Cc:Lawrence King 
Sent:Wednesday, March 25, 2009 8:25 PM
Subject:Re: [TMIC] stem cell (OT?)
 
Re:  ".... I donate blood (4 gallons),  gave a sample to the bone marrow 
registry........."
Not necessarily aborted fetus's. Embryonic stem cells can be grown in a petri 
dish simply by marrying a male sperm with a female egg. It has nothing to do 
with an abortion at all. Adult stem cells have already been programmed, which 
are taken from an adult human, to make that persons body. When taken, they are 
cleaned by a process known as plasma pheresis, then reinjected into that same 
person. An embryonic stem cell has NOT been programmed to make anything yet. It 
can be coaxed to do so where an adult cannot. An embryo is considered just that 
because it does not become a fetus until it is infused with blood. That process 
doesn't happen until twenty eight days after conception, and, it has no brain. 
Taking that into consideration, it is not alive. It can become so if implanted 
into a female uterus, but not until. So, in all actuality, it just sits in that 
petri dish doing absolutely nothing. I hope this gives you better insight as to 
what an embryonic
 stem cell is. 
  
Gunny----
Jim Lubin               
jlu...@eskimo.com
http://makoa.org/jim 
disAbility Resources: http://www.makoa.org


      

Reply via email to