It's hard for me to imagine what kind of brain failure on my part would cause me to interpret this as a linker issue. Apologies...
--chris Rod Evans wrote: > Chris Quenelle wrote: > >>> Encountered problems at the linking stage, figured out that the linker >>> needs patching to handle C++ code properly >>> (Explanined under "C++ Shared Library Patch" at >>> http://docs.sun.com/source/820-4155/c++.html) > > The text under "C++ Shared Library Patch" says: > > A SUNWlibC patch is provided .... > > This patch contains libC, not the linker (ld(1)). > > I'll let the C++ folks on these aliases provide any > information in regard their patches. >
