John wrote: >>> Are you thinking that Jesus was a legalist >>> using my definition?
David wrote: >> Yes. Gary wrote: > myth (this is the typical mind set of those who've rationalized JC as > ~equal to Moses) John had defined legalism in the following way: > It is the imposition of their interpretations upon others > and the elevation of their understanding to the status > of Ex-Cathedra. Gary, can you explain how it is that Jesus was not imposing his interpretation upon others those times he went into the Temple and chased out the merchants? Also, can you explain to me how you can read a chapter like Mat. 23 and not think that Jesus had elevated his understanding to the status of "Ex-Cathedra"? Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
