DAVEH: Did you look up dispersions, Debbie? It has to do with
painting, and I think if one were to stretch it a bit, one could
probably say Kevin painted himself into a corner with that one! :-)
Debbie Sawczak wrote:
You guys are just pretending (for
fun) not to know that the word is "aspersions", right?
Debbie
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Sunday, May 08, 2005 1:31 AM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Dispersions
DAVEH: Hmmmmmm.......Now that I think about it, perhaps you are my
mental problem! ;-)
Still waiting for you to define dispersions,
Kevin. If you want to make an accusation about me, it would be nice
to know the definition of that accusation. Don't you think you should
withdraw the accusation if you aren't able to offer a pertinent
definition???
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Do you have a mental problem?
DAVEH: None of your points below meet the
qualification of disperse, Kevin. I asked you to define dispersions,
and you failed to do so, since you did not post the requested
definition. So again Kevin......Look up the definition of dispersion,
and then let me know again how I've dispersed Perry.
BTW.....I would be curious to know if Perry agrees with you on
this, Kevin........Perry, do you feel I have been casting dispersions
on you???
Now Kevin.....Let me ask if you are possibly bearing false
witness. Did I claim Perry was angry, or did I ask him if he was
angry? Do you recognize the difference?
Now look at all the other points you've made. Have I accused him
of the things you've said, or did I ASK him i f he exhibited those
characteristics? Go back and read them carefully Kevin, and I think
you will find that you are assuming something that is not true in the
way I communicated with Perry. When I suggested he was attacking
Mormonism, he even agreed in a backhanded way (see his last comment
below). So what's the problem, Kevin.....got a burr under your
saddle???
As for your comment about me being anti-Christian, or
anti-Bible....I think you'll find I believe the Bible more literally
than you. Furthermore, I'd like to think my behavior contrasts any
anti-Christian implications you may want to lay on my shoulders.
To change the subject slightly, how about you, Kevin? Do you view
yourself as an anti-Mormon? And, do you get angry when discussing
these things with me? And finally....Do you feel I am casting dispersions
on you by asking you those questions???
Kevin Deegan wrote:
give me one example where I've dispersed him
You claim he is ANGRY, an ANTI, he is ATTACKING, with
Internal HANG UPS
DAVEH: Do you feel compelled to attack other
religions as you do the LDS Church?
DAVEH: Referring to you as an anti-Mormon would
have no political or social consequences on TT. I think the description
fits you well, and see no reason why you should not be
comfortable wearing it.
DAVEH: Is there a possibility the reason you are
repulsed is an internal hang-up rather than with what I
actually post?
DAVEH: Did you awake having a knot in your stomach and feeling
angry?
I count the number, as four here.
You try to discredit by labeling him.
DAVEH:
Casting dispersions against Perry? Don't think so, Kevin.
I'm just helping Perry understand how he comes across to me. If you
think I've cast a single dispersion against Perry, please define dispersion
and then give me one example where I've dispersed
him....so to speak.
As for proving Mormonism true.....I've never attempted to do that
on TT.
Kevin Deegan wrote:
DaveH If you want to discuss Theology why do you
cast all these dispersions against Perry
character?
Even if he was a ANGRY, ANTI, ATTACKING, with
Internal HANG UPS, type person as you paint the picture, what exactly
about that picture, proves Mormonism true?
Dave,
>>It is not what we have in common that is the problem...it is
what we do
>>NOT have in common.
>DAVEH: So you have no interest in discussing theology in an effort
to see
>what we might believe in common?
Cpl: Not Really. I have an interest in exposing the error called
mormonism.
>DAVEH: To you, TT merely is a place to convert people to your way
of
>thinking. Am I reading you wrong on this? If not, then for what
reason
>did you come to TT, Perry?
Cpl: I am here to convert no one. My original purpose was different
than it
is now. My purpose now seems to be to expose satanically inspired
heresy of
the mormons. At least that is the direction in which I am being drawn.
>DAVEH: ??? politacally charged framework??? Referring to you as an
>anti-Mormon would have no poli tical o r social consequences on TT.
I think
>the description fits you well, and see no reason why you should not
be
>comfortable wearing it.
Cpl: These days the term “anti-whatever” is used by sinners to
discredit
those who disagree with their behavior and beliefs. If that is your
best
defense against my claims, then call me what you like.
>DAVEH: Do you feel compelled to attack other religions as you do
the LDS
>Church? IOW....If there was a Catholic TTer, would you treat them
the same
>way you treat Mormons?
Not the same, but I would engage them. They are a Christian church with
errors…the mormons are a satanically inspired heretical group in total
error.
>>I can only tell what I know and believe.
>DAVEH: That's where I see you might have a problem, Perry. You seem
more
>intent on attacking rather than sharing your beliefs.
Cpl: If you feel the truth as an attack, maybe it is your fait h that
has a
problem.
>DAVEH: Is there a possibility the reason you are repulsed is an
internal
>hang-up rather than with what I actually post?
Cpl: If my internal hang-up is that I am repulsed by Satan, the praise
God.
I have the gift of discernment!
>DAVEH: Now....knowing how repulsed you are at the beliefs I
espouse, would
>you advocate I not post my beliefs on TT?
Cpl: Never. But, since the forum is called "truth-talk", posting
deceptions
here does seem strange.
>DAVEH: In times past, some other TTers felt it was wrong for me to
even be
>a member of TT. Do you feel that way as well? IF you feel it is OK
for me
>to be a TTer, do you think it is OK to post my beliefs here as
freely as
>you or any other TTers?
Cpl: No. Sure.
>DAVEH: Did you awake having a knot in your stomach and feeling
angry? No
>offense Perry, but that's the way you come across many times.
C pl: No. I am not angry. I am repulsed.
>>I recoil at the presence of Satan
>DAVEH: ??? Meaning me? :-(
Cpl: You are not the center of our discussion, Dave. Satan and his
mormon
church are.
>DAVEH: Do you feel I am bringing evil to TT? If so, (other than
Blaine)
>have you felt that way about other TTers as well?
Cpl: You are merely deceived and bringing this deception into the forum.
>DAVEH: Or, Perry....is it not possible the Lord may want you to
know more
>about what I believe rather than for me to hear what you believe?
Cpl: That is possible, but if so, it is probably not for the reasons
you
think it is.
>DAVEH: Perhaps so.....From what I experience in TT, I certainly
have much
>more appreciation for my LDS culture than I had before.
Cpl: I can understand why Satan would tighten his grip on you when he
is
attacked.
Perry
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
|