Rebecca Corry interview

Posted without comment

https://variety.com/2022/streaming/news/rebecca-corry-speaks-up-comedian-louis-ck-grammys-dogs-1235233799/


On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:23 AM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:

> That’s about the worst analysis I’ve seen yet. He won a Grammy for
> material that mocked his own behavior. CK didn’t rehabilitate himself or
> his career; his career merely shifted course. He’s an ass. The people who
> nominated and voted for him are the same ilk as those who gave Will Smith a
> standing ovation. It’s why all these award shows need to go away or at
> least go back to being private, industry events. It’s not even that we are
> seeing how the sausage is made; it is that we are seeing how amoral the
> sausage makers truly are, and the more we see that, the more people will go
> vegan.
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 5:14 AM PGage <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think Alyssa Rosenberg at the WaPo has it about right (extended fair
>> use excerpts below):
>>
>>
>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/04/05/louis-ck-grammy-not-a-defeat-for-metoo/
>>
>> “It’s natural to feel a flare of disgust when a disgraced man is given a
>> shot at a professional comeback — and there’s no doubt that was the
>> reaction of many viewers when Louis C.K. won best comedy album at the
>> Grammys this past weekend.But C.K.’s triumph is no outrage. It might even
>> be a sign of a healthy new normal…
>>
>
>> Deciding which offenders deserve career rehabilitation and under which
>> circumstances will always be fraught. But in C.K.’s case, the entertainment
>> industry seems to have gotten it right…
>>
>> The results aren’t always going to be satisfactory. But acknowledging a
>> performer’s enormous talents while limiting his ability to make full use of
>> them seems a fair punishment. Louis C.K.’s Grammy isn’t a defeat for the
>> #MeToo movement. It’s a sign that the reckoning, in this case, has stuck.“
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 9:16 AM PGage <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, I guess I am arguing for more of a continuum between fully
>>> “cancelled” and fully back. LCK does not yet seem fully back, and I’m not
>>> convinced he deserves permanent full cancellation, though I am open to
>>> being persuaded otherwise.
>>>
>>> On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 7:43 AM 'David Bruggeman' via TVorNotTV <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have difficulty seeing Louis as cancelled if he's still booking gigs
>>>> as a standup.  I recognize that some would consider any loss of
>>>> professional standing as cancellation.  I'm not in that group.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, April 4, 2022, 07:10:51 AM PDT, PGage <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [I think I’m using that British term correctly]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I’m not sure about this: I’m not sure that winning a comedy album
>>>> Grammy is the marker of being back. He is selling out dates on his
>>>> Euro-tour, but that is not quite the same as being back to where he was 5
>>>> years ago, which was close to the very top of his field.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn’t buy a ticket to see him, especially since he is apparently
>>>> using his show to make light of what he did. But I’m not sure what he did
>>>> deserves a lifetime ban or the full Harvey Weinstein.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> “Louis C.K. brought home a Grammy on Sunday despite having admitted to
>>>> sexual misconduct and subsequently enduring almost five years in
>>>> professional comedy purgatory.
>>>>
>>>> C.K.'s album, Sincerely Louis C.K., beat out five other nominees —
>>>> including Lewis Black, Kevin Hart and Chelsea Handler — for best comedy
>>>> album at the 64th Grammy Awards. The comeback album was his first release
>>>> since the 54-year-old was accused of masturbating in front of multiple
>>>> female colleagues in November 2017….”
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.npr.org/2022/04/04/1090743278/louis-c-k-crawls-out-of-cancellation-wins-a-grammy-and-triggers-a-backlash
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/1622284940.839717.1649083401412%40mail.yahoo.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/1622284940.839717.1649083401412%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkY%2BmhoCaVRwtRhQsKfwN8hhtzpPXnqiqkaGvcNFRaE%2BBxA%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkY%2BmhoCaVRwtRhQsKfwN8hhtzpPXnqiqkaGvcNFRaE%2BBxA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>
-- 
Kevin M. (RPCV)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4Cra2-fgCVqTr1RNzDz4BadYQuJJkzgKqjCwqttiwwVGg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to