Makes sense. On the web interface you only ever see update1 to manually retweet.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 04:16, Tim Haines <tmhai...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll give you an unofficial yes. This is exactly the way I understand it > will work. If you star any of the RT's it's update1 that gets the stars > too. > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Hwee-Boon Yar <hweeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I did an experiment. >> >> user1 tweets update1 >> user2 retweets update1 as update2 (a RT, with update1 embedded) >> user3 retweets update2, the embedded update is update1 instead of >> update2. >> >> I can't find documentation on this. Is this the expected behavoir? >> >> -- >> Hwee-Boon >> > > -- Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham Project | Awesome Lists | http://twitterli.st This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private. Sent from Madison, WI, United States