Just so we all can guestimate if we're equiped for and financially
able to consider consumption of the firehose, in average, what's the
daily data throughput on a firehose stream?
Thanks,
Michael.
On Dec 15, 2009, at 9:38 AM, John Kalucki <j...@twitter.com> wrote:
The other levels of Streaming access are not only considerably more
cost effective for all parties, they are also (nearly) sufficient
for the vast majority of applications.
-John Kalucki
http://twitter.com/jkalucki
Services, Twitter Inc.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:16 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <zzn...@gmail.com
> wrote:
Thanks!! At this point, I'm not sure I'll be using the firehose even
if it is available -I don't think I can afford the pipe width to
consume it. ;-)
On Dec 14, 9:59 pm, John Kalucki <j...@twitter.com> wrote:
> There will be further announcements about Streaming API access
early next
> year.
>
> -John Kaluckihttp://twitter.com/jkalucki
> Services, Twitter Inc.
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:09 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
<zzn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Last week at Le Web, Twitter's Platform Director, Ryan Sarver,
> > announced that Twitter will be "opening the firehose to all
> > developers." As I recall, there were a number of reasons why
Twitter
> > kept the firehose restricted. Some of these were "legal reasons".
>
> > I'm starting to put together an action plan for 2010, and I'm
really
> > curious - what has changed legally since then that would allow
Twitter
> > to open the firehose to "all developers?" What legal agreements /
> > licenses / contracts must a developer commit to in order to gain
> > access to the firehose?
>
> > --
> > M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
> >http://borasky-research.net
>
> > "I've always regarded nature as the clothing of God." ~Alan
Hovhaness
