On 14/11/19 2:44 PM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> Instead of looking getting reference to SYSFW device using name which
> is not guaranteed to be constant, use phandle supplied in the DT node to
> get reference to SYSFW
>
> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigne...@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
> index 2380780879f5..b3947cbf432c 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
> @@ -1273,7 +1273,8 @@ static int udma_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_FIRMWARE, "dmsc", &tisci_dev);
> + ret = uclass_get_device_by_phandle(UCLASS_FIRMWARE, dev,
> + "ti,sci", &tisci_dev);
> if (ret) {
> debug("TISCI RA RM get failed (%d)\n", ret);
Isn't this debug statement wrong?
Thanks and regards,
Lokesh
> ud->tisci = NULL;
>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
