JayJay

These were not phantoms.
They were subroutines called from UniObjects sessions, already consuming a
regular licence.
That was the bug.

Regards

Brian 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins
> Sent: 16 March 2007 20:54
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] User discrepancy
> 
> Brian
> 
> Any PHANTOM that opens a Socket is a license consumer - it's 
> not a bug, it was intentional (see iPHANTOMS).
> 
> Regards
> 
> JayJay
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
> Sent: 14 March 2007 23:08
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] User discrepancy
> 
> Hi
> 
> First, to clear the excess licences you can run the following 
> from a CMD
> prompt:
> 
> uvlictool clean_lic -a
> 
> This should check against actual processes and reset the 
> count correctly.
> 
> I found problems with device licencing and versions of UO.NET 
> - this incorrectly reported the wrong client IP address and 
> took an extra licence.
> Also the iPhantom hit me - any program or subroutine called 
> through a UO session that opened a socket was incorrectly 
> being considered a phantom and so took an extra iPhantom 
> licence. And there's always the old issue of people closing 
> terminal emulator windows without logging off.
> 
> Brian
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Mark Waldron
> > Sent: 14 March 2007 22:05
> > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > Subject: [U2] User discrepancy
> > 
> > I have an issue with users on my system.  Running 
> Win2003/Intel and UV
> > 10.2
> > When I do a USERS I get 78 users logged on the system When I do a 
> > PORT.STATUS it says 18 uniVerse sessions; 17 interactive, 1 phantom 
> > When I look at UniAdmin/Users I get the same 17 Users and 1 
> Background
> > 
> > At times I'm getting Users exceed limit which tells me 
> processes are 
> > not being terminated properly. Also I have been having trouble with 
> > record locks since the upgrade to 10.2.
> > New server hardware and OS (Win=2003) was cloned from the 
> old server 
> > (Win2000) then the upgrade to 10.2 occurred.  This may be 
> some of the 
> > issue but that's the way my network guy likes to build servers.  We 
> > have a lot of local users and this doesn't require us to rekey 
> > everyone.
> > Any thoughts on maybe a file or something that I might be 
> corrupt that 
> > I could fix?
> > Thanks in advance,
> > 
> > Mark Waldron
> > Director of Information Systems
> > City of Salem, Va
> > -------
> > u2-users mailing list
> > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> -------
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> -------
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to