Is the test case attached in comment #8 insufficient? According to the gcc documentation ( in particular, http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Nested-Functions.html ), the code should be valid as long as the call to the nested function is executed before the outer function exits. I take it this functionality isn't actually used much, but to me anyway it seems like a bug..
(I should also confirm that mountall 0.1.7 fixes the issue for me, thanks.) -- mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
