I think we should do this. Regression potential seems low as it would
only introduce and alias for the now standardized name. The key exchange
itself under a openssh private name is already available and enabled on
Jammy and Noble.
For the record the commits are:
Noble:
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/4306a0ccb712249c98c0ab1a8ad4bf0761be4011
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/68b5963fea1d421821648734096f5d5e0492663a
Jammy:
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/ffdbae4c0201d42bfa1f5c5e9c21454d10795491
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/b738f18f4b26cbd92cd0dfcff960d5f2ee7c0f9
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2120496
Title:
Consider enabling sntrup761x25519-sha512 post-quantum algorithm for
stable releases
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2120496/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
