In comment 13:
> Yes, we have to upload a new mesa and set versioned breaks.
Assuming that was a reply to comment 12, that wasn’t what I was worried
about. Even when a new mesa is uploaded with versioned breaks, it will
still have the problem I described:
“Hmm, it’s still not possible for me to install nvidia-current on x86_64
but configure it to not be used, because although x86_64-linux-
gnu_GL.conf can be overridden by the mesa version, there is no mesa
version of i386-linux-gnu_GL.conf, and nvidia’s i386-linux-gnu_GL.conf
includes the 64-bit libraries too.”
> I know that removing all non multiarch gl_conf alternatives may not
> seems exactly a good idea but I've noticed that installing a multiarch
> alternative beside a non multiarch one would fail because they point
> to the same files (despite using different links).
My suggestion was not that you should install the multiarch alternative
beside the non-multiarch alternative pointing to the same files. It was
“It should only delete the [non-multiarch alternative] belonging to
itself.” This is what libgl1-mesa-glx.postinst does, and it’s what I
did in my patch:
case "$1" in
configure)
# on upgrade from previous versions, clean up our non-arch-qualified
# alternative
if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt-nl 275.09.07-0ubuntu2; then
update-alternatives --remove gl_conf
/usr/lib/nvidia-current/ld.so.conf
fi
# Deal with alternatives
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798049
Title:
nvidia-* and fglrx need to be migrated to per-architecture gl_conf
alternative
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/798049/+subscriptions
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
