Philippe Verdy wrote: > I maintain that if you remove the glyph shown for latin letter oi > (considered only as informative and not mandatory in any of its aspects), > and just keep its normative name, then many people will think that the > encoded character really represents a letter named or pronounced "oi". Which > is completely wrong in our case. But would allow people to use the assigned > code point to represent the L-shaped character "i with lower-right hook"...
Not a good idea: the Nogai and Khakass languages appear to have used both gha/oi and "i with lower right hook" according to http://www.writingsystems.net/languages/nogai/nogailatin.htm and http://www.writingsystems.net/languages/khakass/khakasslatin.htm . Charles Cox
