At 11:41 AM -0500 10/6/2005, Chipp Walters wrote:
I, for one, hope it doesn't dissapear, as I use 'delete stack' quite
often. It's the only sure-fire way to make sure a stack is closed,
and I'd have to rewrite many, many stacks if it went away.
It's unfortunately named, and could certainly use a better synonym.
But it does 'delete a stack from memory' as it says. Once you get
the hang of it, and know to never use it on subStacks, it's not too
bad.
Take a look at the proposal, Chipp. It's to deprecate "delete stack"
and replace it with two new commands - one to delete a substack from
its stack file, and the other to remove a main stack from memory. The
functionality will still be there - just split into two commands, to
match the two things delete stack does. ;-)
--
jeanne a. e. devoto ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jaedworks.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
