Interoperability with .Net is a major concern for me. So, I am glad to hear that CXF improves on that front. Thanks for the info.
Christopher Moesel wrote: > I've used both XFire and CXF. In my opinion, CXF is actually quite good! It > contains all the things I liked about XFire plus it has better standards > compliance, and in my testing has been more interoperable with .NET clients > too. > > So, in my opinion, CXF is not only as good as XFire, but better! But... you > really can't go wrong with either! > > -Chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ceki Gulcu > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:35 PM > To: User list for the slf4j project > Subject: Re: [slf4j-user] java.lang.IllegalStateException: Level number 20 is > not recognized. > > > Thanks for the information. > > On a different register, I was quite impressed by Xfire. Is CXF as good? > > Christopher Moesel wrote: >> Hi Ceki, >> >> I found my problem-- the CXF project had a reference to slf4j-jdk14 version >> 1.3.1 in one of their POMs. So, it came in as a transitive dependency. As >> it turns out, I didn't need that particular CXF module anyway (oops!) so I >> removed it and now everything works! Great! Thanks! >> >> I'll pop an email over to the CXF folks to ask them to upgrade. >> >> -Chris -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch _______________________________________________ user mailing list user@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
