On 6/22/07, Tom Samplonius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
----- "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So we need a working reliable layer on top of UDP which is capable of > handling re-requests of missing packets etc. The current code is work ... I think that is called TCP. Why UDP at all? Is this for multicasting? Otherwise, I can't see any reason why not to use TCP?
For reliable multicast; some folks want to use that. But I agree, for most things TCP is the best choice. -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
