Sure :-). Otherwise patches are always welcome On 8/20/07, Stefan Arentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What would it take to get this in AMQ? Is this something you guys > could do if it were a sponsored task? > > On 8/20/07, Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > we dont actively try and purge messages from storage yet - only when > > they are paged in from store to process (e.g. if there is a consumer > > already). > > This is a known issue: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/ > > AMQ-1112 > > > > > > cheers, > > > > Rob > > > > 'Go Get Integrated - ride the Camel! - http://activemq.apache.org/ > > camel/' > > http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > On Aug 18, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Stefan Arentz wrote: > > > > > I have a queue that contains messages with an expiration time of 60 > > > seconds. However I only see this queue growing. It is currently 30K > > > messages. I do see some decreases in size on JMX console graphs but > > > nothing that comes close to expiring messages that are now days old. > > > What could be the cause of that? > > > > > > When I look in log files of consumers I see that expiration is > > > enabled: > > > > > > ActiveMQObjectMessage { ... expiration = 1187454102768, timestamp = > > > 1187454042768 ... } > > > > > > But it does not seem to actually work. > > > > > > Has anyone seen this before? > > > > > > S. > > > > >
-- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
