You are going to need provide a little more information than this.  What
are you doing in the C++ code.  Can you provide a sample app that
demonstrates the problem?

I assume that this is coming out in the ActiveMQ console window, not
from the c++ client as a BrokerError?  

Regards
Tim.

On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 10:39 -0800, JohnOldman wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Running SUSE 10.2 using CMS 2.1.1 with ActiveMQ 4.1 and stomp.
> 
> Set up is one producer and two consumers (for failover).
> 
> We have set JMSXGroupID in the producer, to make failover work, so only one
> consumer consumes.
> 
> And on receiving messages the producer dumps the following errors:
> 
> <-----snip----->
> WARN  QueueSubscription              - Failed to set boolean header:
> javax.jms.MessageNotWriteableException: Message properties are read-only
> javax.jms.MessageNotWriteableException: Message properties are read-only
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.command.ActiveMQMessage.checkReadOnlyProperties(ActiveMQMessage.java:568)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.command.ActiveMQMessage.setObjectProperty(ActiveMQMessage.java:382)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.command.ActiveMQMessage.setBooleanProperty(ActiveMQMessage.java:534)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.QueueSubscription.assignGroupToMe(QueueSubscription.java:134)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.QueueSubscription.canDispatch(QueueSubscription.java:101)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.PrefetchSubscription.dispatch(PrefetchSubscription.java:383)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.QueueSubscription.dispatch(QueueSubscription.java:172)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.PrefetchSubscription.add(PrefetchSubscription.java:129)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.policy.RoundRobinDispatchPolicy.dispatch(RoundRobinDispatchPolicy.java:58)
>         at org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue.dispatch(Queue.java:520)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue.sendMessage(Queue.java:346)
>         at org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue.send(Queue.java:326)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.AbstractRegion.send(AbstractRegion.java:292)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.RegionBroker.send(RegionBroker.java:382)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransactionBroker.send(TransactionBroker.java:193)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerFilter.send(BrokerFilter.java:126)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.CompositeDestinationBroker.send(CompositeDestinationBroker.java:98)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.MutableBrokerFilter.send(MutableBrokerFilter.java:136)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.processMessage(TransportConnection.java:498)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.command.ActiveMQMessage.visit(ActiveMQMessage.java:604)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.service(TransportConnection.java:294)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection$1.onCommand(TransportConnection.java:185)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.onCommand(TransportFilter.java:65)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.onCommand(InactivityMonitor.java:122)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.stomp.StompTransportFilter.sendToActiveMQ(StompTransportFilter.java:81)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.stomp.ProtocolConverter.sendToActiveMQ(ProtocolConverter.java:119)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.stomp.ProtocolConverter.onStompSend(ProtocolConverter.java:204)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.stomp.ProtocolConverter.onStompCommad(ProtocolConverter.java:139)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.stomp.StompTransportFilter.onCommand(StompTransportFilter.java:71)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.doConsume(TransportSupport.java:84)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:137)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> <-----snip----->
> 
> 
> I understand that properties are read only - is the CMS violating this? 
> 

Reply via email to