It doesnt seem that this comment from the site is in the context of a failover, only that if a master cant contact a slave, it wont process messages. In a cluster setup this seems quite bizarre that the system would stop responding if the passive node was down.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Yes that is exactly right. The master cannot take over from the slave. > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:21 AM, qlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have the same question on it. When I kills slave broker, I have found > that > > the master broker is down as well. > > AMQ developer, would you please explain it for us. Thanks a lot. > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/pure-master-slave-tp18831368p18845063.html > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > Open Source SOA > http://open.iona.com >
