Hi all, For a test case, see http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1820
cheers Nicolas 2008/8/18 Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Yes - this is bizarre - and what you are seeing is not by design > Could you submit a test case ? > > cheers, > > Rob > > Rob Davies > http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ > > > > On 18 Aug 2008, at 02:13, AD wrote: > > It doesnt seem that this comment from the site is in the context of a >> failover, only that if a master cant contact a slave, it wont process >> messages. In a cluster setup this seems quite bizarre that the system >> would >> stop responding if the passive node was down. >> >> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >wrote: >> >> Yes that is exactly right. The master cannot take over from the slave. >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:21 AM, qlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I have the same question on it. When I kills slave broker, I have found >>>> >>> that >>> >>>> the master broker is down as well. >>>> AMQ developer, would you please explain it for us. Thanks a lot. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> >>> http://www.nabble.com/pure-master-slave-tp18831368p18845063.html >>> >>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Hiram >>> >>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com >>> >>> Open Source SOA >>> http://open.iona.com >>> >>> >
