Great! thx!
On 19 Aug 2008, at 13:37, Nicolas Mervaillie wrote:
Hi all,
For a test case, see http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1820
cheers
Nicolas
2008/8/18 Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes - this is bizarre - and what you are seeing is not by design
Could you submit a test case ?
cheers,
Rob
Rob Davies
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
On 18 Aug 2008, at 02:13, AD wrote:
It doesnt seem that this comment from the site is in the context of a
failover, only that if a master cant contact a slave, it wont
process
messages. In a cluster setup this seems quite bizarre that the
system
would
stop responding if the passive node was down.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes that is exactly right. The master cannot take over from the
slave.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:21 AM, qlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have the same question on it. When I kills slave broker, I
have found
that
the master broker is down as well.
AMQ developer, would you please explain it for us. Thanks a lot.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/pure-master-slave-tp18831368p18845063.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com
