Hi, can u please explain the behaviou in this particular case after the TimeOut. will there be an exception thrown if the timeout occurs.
Thanks in advance rajdavies wrote: > > > On 11 Dec 2008, at 01:38, emc2family wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> when a broker starts to block producers as a result of producer flow >> control, is there an elegant way for a producer to timeout as a >> result of >> this? i was thinking of setting the message's timetolive to achieve >> this. >> i suppose i could also use maxinactivityduration. i think both will >> throw a >> jmsexception. which leads me to my next question. is there a >> specific >> error code for a timetolive or maxinactivityduration exceptions? >> thanks a >> bunch. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/how-to-best-implement-a-producer-timeout-tp20947923p20947923.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > Not elegant - but one of these - if you are sending with default > delivery mode (PERSISTENT): > > When you create your MessageProducer - cast it to an > org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageProducer and set it via the > setSendTimeout(int ) method > or > > > set the sendTimeout property on the ActiveMQConnection > > or set the sendTimeout on the ActiveMQConnectionFactory - either > directly or via a property > > or my favourite: > > Set the sendTimeout as a property on the destination used to create > the producer - e.g. if you want to send on a Topic called "foo" - call > > Destination dest= session.createTopic("foo?producer.sendTimeout="5000"); > MessageProducer producer = session.createProducer(dest); > > > > cheers, > > Rob > > Rob Davies > http://fusesource.com > http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-to-best-implement-a-producer-timeout-tp20947923p20949967.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
