I'll also express strong interest in AMQP and I'll take the liberty of saying that most people using stomp for cross platform integration with ActiveMQ should be expressing interest. With the influx of enterprise apps being written in dynamic languages, AMQP offers high end messaging features in a platform agnostic way.
I would also caution against assuming that the people who want AMQP for messaging are likely to seek you out to express that interest. If I'm a ruby on rails or a django shop and I figure out I need a messaging solution for cross platform integration, I'll soon have an interest in AMQP. When I look for implementations I'll find RabbitMQ or Redhat Messaging, or AMQP in Fedora 10 and never think about ActiveMQ. In fact, if you don't support AMQP that will be a talking point against deploying ActiveMQ in an IT environment where ruby or python apps exist. I've already had that happen at my company and I've played down AMQP as still in development, not quite fully baked, but now with Fedora 10 touting AMQP as a major new feature, that argument's lifespan is ending and people are becoming more aware of it. James.Strachan wrote: > > 2008/12/19 loctorp <boris.kartasch...@logica.com>: >> >> Hi everyone, >> I was wondering about the current status of AMQP implementation into >> acticeMQ. On the project page it states, that there is a sandbox version >> and >> that developement has been paused. >> >> As we are interested in using activeMQ together with AMQP we were >> wondering >> if this status has changed and/or are interested in the up-to-date >> outlook. > > The status hasn't changed since that wiki page was written. Welcome - > you're the first person ever to express any interest in AMQP with > ActiveMQ :) > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/actual-status-of-activeMQ-and-AMQP-tp21092034p21671180.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
