must add I tested the same code with other queuers (QPID, ...) and I get
exception with these queuers ...


mffrench wrote:
> 
> yes my client is connected... and it only receive message (it's a jms
> listener).
> can you tell me what options I must set to enable the log level in the
> activemq client ?
> 
> Some netstat
> 
> Before killing :
> 
> tcp6       0      0 *:61611                 *:*                     LISTEN    
> 18673/java          
> tcp6       0      0 localhost:35073         localhost:61611        
> ESTABLISHED18727/java          
> tcp6       0      0 localhost:61611         localhost:35073        
> ESTABLISHED18673/java   
> 
> After killing : 
> 
> tcp6       0      0 localhost:61611         localhost:35073        
> TIME_WAIT  -   
> 
> The listener is alway running and no exception is raised...
> 
> 
> Gary Tully wrote:
>> 
>> Is your client really connected? Has it sent or received a message. With
>> activemq, the connection is created on demand on first but not when the
>> connection factory is created.
>> Can you enable debug logging and see what additional information you can
>> gather?
>> 
>> 2009/3/18 mffrench <mffre...@axway.com>
>> 
>>>
>>> Here's my JNDI configuration :
>>>
>>> java.naming.factory.initial =
>>> org.apache.activemq.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory
>>> java.naming.provider.url = tcp://127.0.0.1:61611
>>> connectionFactoryNames = MICHEL
>>> queue.TEST = TEST
>>>
>>> As you can see I provide a brokerUrl with tcp://... and I never get any
>>> exceptions...
>>>
>>>
>>> Gary Tully wrote:
>>> >
>>> > If this is 5.2, and you do not provide a brokerUrl to your activemq
>>> > connection factory then the failover transport will be used by default
>>> and
>>> > it will block waiting to reconnect.
>>> > Provide a brokerUrl and use "tcp://..." and you will get the exception
>>> you
>>> > require.
>>> >
>>> > 2009/3/18 mffrench <mffre...@axway.com>
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Hello,
>>> >>
>>> >> if I kill ActiveMQ, there is no exception raised to my connected JMS
>>> >> listener and so my client doesn't detect the link is broken with
>>> >> ActiveMQ.
>>> >> I
>>> >> think this is a bug which should be corrected. Is there any issue
>>> about
>>> >> this
>>> >> ?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks
>>> >> --
>>> >> View this message in context:
>>> >>
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Killing-activemq-with-connected-JMS-listener-tp22576446p22576446.html
>>> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > http://blog.garytully.com
>>> >
>>> > Open Source SOA
>>> > http://FUSESource.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Killing-activemq-with-connected-JMS-listener-tp22576446p22583895.html
>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> http://blog.garytully.com
>> 
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://FUSESource.com
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Killing-activemq-with-connected-JMS-listener-tp22576446p22585097.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to