Hi, in case of multiple interconnected brokers you need to use "suppressDuplicateTopicSubscriptions" attribute (see for more info http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html). Also "priority network dispatch policy" should be used as explained here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2753. We need to document this use case better.
Regards -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb ----------------- The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:27 PM, David Fischer(Gtalk) <fischer....@gmail.com > wrote: > All, > > I have been testing the spoke hub model and i have yet to be able to > get a setup that does not duplicate messages if network TTL is greater > than 1. Does anyone have any insight into Topics and network of > brokers??? > > Thanks > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:53 AM, David Fischer(Gtalk) > <fischer....@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > > > > I currently for a network of brokers setup and running with queues > > fine. The problem that i am running into is the following: > > > > brokerA <=> brokerB <=> brokerC > > > > if i create a topic pub on brokerA i cannot see the messages on > > brokerC with out adding networkTLL > 1. If i do this then as i add > > more subscribers i start to get duplicates. > > > > my network connector is as follows: > > <networkConnectors> > > <networkConnector uri="static://( hostsremovedtoprotect)" > > dynamicOnly="true" name="InterTopicconnect" > > > <dynamicallyIncludedDestinations> > > <topic physicalName="Services.>"/> > > </dynamicallyIncludedDestinations> > > </networkConnector> > > <networkConnector uri="static://(hostsremovedtoprotect )" > > conduitSubscriptions="false" > > suppressDuplicateQueueSubscriptions="true" networkTTL="4" > > name="InterQueueconnect" > > > <dynamicallyIncludedDestinations> > > <queue physicalName="test"/> > > </dynamicallyIncludedDestinations> > > </networkConnector> > > <networkConnectors> > > > > Does any one has any suggestions? > > >