Trunk should be pretty stable at the moment. You can test the latest snapshot for starters ( https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/) and see how it goes.
Regards -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb ----------------- The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:04 PM, mserrano <mar...@attivio.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I need the fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3542. > > Should I try to patch 5.5.1 up as needed to include the fixes for it? Or > should I use trunk? I'm not sure how > stable trunk is or how close 5.6 is to shipping. > > Thanks, > Martin > > p.s. I'm trying to deal with a situation where I'm using master/slave plus > networked brokers. When the master fails (or is shutdown shortly after > startup), the associated slave does not pick up the consumers that are > registered elsewhere on the network. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/should-I-use-trunk-or-patch-5-5-1-tp4262847p4262847.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
