Thanks. These postings hits the Mark Richard's article right on the bull's eye.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Christian Posta <christian.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sean K, > Looks like you already got a response from James :) > But here's at least one discussion that took place a while ago about this > very subject: > > http://www.jroller.com/RickHigh/entry/amqp_versus_jms > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Sean K <sk92...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Has anyone responded to this article written by Mark Richards about >> AMQP and JMS (includes ActiveMQ)? >> >> Specifically: >> >> >> "This means that message clients using AMQP are completely agnostic as >> to which AMQP clients API or >> AMQP message broker you are using." -- I remember hearing something >> like that about Java -- Write once, run everywhere -- which was a lie. >> >> Or, "While it is true vendors such as SonicMQ, ActiveMQ, and HornetQ >> provide some level of cross platform interoperability, they do so >> through proprietary protocols, APIs, and client libraries. ..." My >> thought is -- is this really true? I thought all of ActiveMQ is open >> source via Apache, thus it should be another standard that should be a >> louder standard than AMQP. >> >> Last, how different is openwire protocol from the AMQP protocol? >> >> Can anyone respond to these issues, or point me to articles that >> address these from the ActiveMQ point of view? >> > > > > -- > *Christian Posta* > http://www.christianposta.com/blog > twitter: @christianposta
