yep, good point. from here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2790
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > prefetch is relevant here. the pending cursor on the client has priority > support[0-9] so x prefetched messages with priority [0-5] will get > reordered on the client. > with prefetch=0, the order will be fifo. > > Note: the jdbc store does priority order [0-9] > > > On 21 March 2013 15:38, mikmela <mikm...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > The http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html > > <http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html> > says > > that > > *For KahaDB three priority levels are supported, Low (<5), Default (=5) > and > > High (>5).*. > > However, our tests show that messages with different priorities in the > > range > > < 5 (Low) where processed by consumer in proper order, not FIFO as we > > thought... Does it mean that desription is not uup-do-date and it was > > addressed at some point? > > Just want to make sure that we can rely on this behaviour and it not a > some > > side effect? > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message-priority-is-needed-tp4665014.html > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > -- > http://redhat.com > http://blog.garytully.com > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
