http://activemq.apache.org/slow-consumer-handling.html
> We have a MessageEvictionStrategy which is used to decide which message should be evicted on a slow consumer. I’m also unclear why / if this is happening. If I have a slow consumer I definitely don’t just want messages being removed from my queue. But right now I can’t figure out if it’s happening. On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu> wrote: > Are you talking about message expiration? Or do you have another > definition for message eviction that I'm not thinking of? > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com> wrote: > > > Does the same apply to evictions? > > > > If I have messages begin evicted by ActiveMQ I definitely want to know > it! > > :) > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com> wrote: > > > > > Cool! > > > > > > I think broker level at a minimum but I imagine having both on the > > > destination level would be good too. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5624 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu> > wrote: > > > > > >> This sounds like a useful feature; submit an Enhancement in JIRA for > > it... > > >> > > >> Were you looking for a broker-level count (count of slow consumers on > > all > > >> destinations) or a destination-level count? Or both? (Implementing > > both > > >> seems most useful to me, and not particularly hard to do.) > > >> > > >> Tim > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > According to this: > > >> > > > >> > http://activemq.apache.org/jmx.html > > >> > > > >> > There are no simple metrics for the number of slow consumers. > > >> > > > >> > Is there an easy way to figure this out? > > >> > > > >> > Would be nice for monitoring systems so that alerts can be > triggered. > > >> > > > >> > Right now you have to enumerate each subscriber but it takes 200ms > for > > >> each > > >> > one so it could take a rather long time. > > >> > > > >> > Plus, it’s better to have something O(1) for monitoring systems vs > > >> > something O(N) which might take a rather long time. > > >> > -- > > >> > > > >> > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com > > >> > Location: *San Francisco, CA* > > >> > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com > > >> > … or check out my Google+ profile > > >> > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> > > >> > <http://spinn3r.com> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com > > > Location: *San Francisco, CA* > > > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com > > > … or check out my Google+ profile > > > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> > > > <http://spinn3r.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com > > Location: *San Francisco, CA* > > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com > > … or check out my Google+ profile > > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> > > <http://spinn3r.com> > > > -- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com>
