Fyi:
1953068645(decimal) = 74697665(hexadecimal) = "tive"(ascii text)
And "tive" is likely part of the string "ActiveMQ"?
e.

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: tobias.w...@t-systems.com <tobias.w...@t-systems.com> 
Verzonden: maandag 22 maart 2021 16:41
Aan: users@activemq.apache.org
Onderwerp: AW: send message


EXTERNAL SENDER:   Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you 
trust the sender and know the content is safe.
EXPÉDITEUR EXTERNE:    Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce 
jointe à moins qu’ils ne proviennent d’un expéditeur fiable, ou que vous ayez 
l'assurance que le contenu provient d'une source sûre.

While sending / receiving a text message I get this

java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Error reading in simpleString, 
length=1953068645 is greater than readableBytes=3
        at 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.SimpleString.readSimpleString(SimpleString.java:185)
        at 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.SimpleString.readSimpleString(SimpleString.java:173)
        at 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.buffers.impl.ChannelBufferWrapper.readStringInternal(ChannelBufferWrapper.java:113)
        at 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.buffers.impl.ChannelBufferWrapper.readString(ChannelBufferWrapper.java:98)
        at 
com.tsystems.gematik.kim.mailserver.mq.MailServerActiveMQClient.receiveTextMessageFromSmtpQueue(MailServerActiveMQClient.java:93)
        at 
com.tsystems.gematik.kim.mailserver.mq.MailServerActiveMQClientTest.sendAndReceive(MailServerActiveMQClientTest.java:28)
        at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
        at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
        at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
        at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
        at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
        at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
        at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:89)
        at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:41)
        at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:541)
        at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:763)
        at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:463)
        at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:209)


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
Gesendet: Montag, 22. März 2021 16:34
An: users@activemq.apache.org
Betreff: Re: send message

What actually fails? Do you have a stack-trace?


Justin

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 9:53 AM <tobias.w...@t-systems.com> wrote:

> I try to send and receive a netty ByteBuf message, but it fails.
> What I'm doing wrong here? I even don't know ist he mistake in sending 
> or receiving!
> I was thinking to use the jms layer, but I'm receiving the data buffer 
> throught a netty buffer and I want to avoid to convert the buffer to a 
> byte array!
>
>        public void sendMessageToSmtpQueue(ByteBuf buf) throws 
> ActiveMQException {
>              ClientSession session = this.sessionFactory.createSession();
>              try {
>                     session.start();
>                     ClientMessage message = session.createMessage(true);
>                     message.getBodyBuffer().writeBytes(buf, 0, 
> buf.readableBytes());
>                     ClientProducer producer = 
> session.createProducer(ACTIVE_MQ_SMTP_QUEUE);
>                     producer.send(message);
>              } finally {
>                     session.close();
>              }
>        }
>
>        public ActiveMQBuffer receiveMessageFromSmtpQueue() throws 
> ActiveMQException {
>              ActiveMQBuffer result;
>              ClientSession session = this.sessionFactory.createSession();
>              try {
>                     session.start();
>                     ClientConsumer consumer = 
> session.createConsumer(ACTIVE_MQ_SMTP_QUEUE);
>                     ClientMessage message = consumer.receive();
>                     result =
> ActiveMQBuffers.fixedBuffer(message.getBodyBufferSize());
>                     message.getBodyBuffer().readBytes(result);
>              } finally {
>                     session.close();
>              }
>
>              return result;
>        }
>
>
>        public void startServer() throws Exception {
>              this.configuration = new ConfigurationImpl();
>              this.configuration.addAcceptorConfiguration("in-vm",
> ACTIVE_MQ_EMBEDDED_SERVER_URL);
>              this.configuration.setPersistenceEnabled(true);
>              this.configuration.setSecurityEnabled(false);
>              this.configuration.addQueueConfiguration(new
> QueueConfiguration(ACTIVE_MQ_SMTP_QUEUE));
>
>              this.server = new ActiveMQServerImpl(this.configuration);
>              this.server.start();
>        }
>

Reply via email to