Hello Jean-Baptiste, We are using ActiveMQ in TomEE context. So I am just curious about when this version could be included in TomEE releases. I will push for that. Best Regards.
-----Original Message----- From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 17:05 To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Which activeMQ (not Artemis) version will be JMS 2.0 or 3.0 ? Hi, The purpose of the RC is to cut an early release (kind of "cut SNAPSHOT") to allow users to test it before the first "official" release. What I can propose to you is: 1. I need couple of weeks to open the PRs and merge it (I’m on JDK11 now, identifying/fixing/disabling some tests) 2. When done, I will inform you on the mailing list allowing you to test using the SNAPSHOTs (5.17.0-SNAPSHOT) 3. If I don’t see any blocker on SNAPSHOT, then I will move forward on 5.17.0 release Does it sound good to you ? Regards JB > Le 18 mai 2021 à 16:59, Simon Billingsley > <simon.billings...@matrixx.com.INVALID> a écrit : > > Thanks for the details information. > I am interested in the Log4J 2 upgrade. > How long does the release take after the RC process normally? > > Best regards, > Simon. > > > > > On 18 May 2021, at 15:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net><mailto:j...@nanthrax.net > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>> wrote: > > Hi François, > > ActiveMQ 5.17.0 will support JMS 2.0. > > Basically, what I’m planning for ActiveMQ 5.17.0: > - JDK11 build > - Spring 5 > - Log4j2 > - JMS 2.0 > > About date target, I’m working on JDK11 build now and the other PRs will > follow. I would like to submit a first 5.17 RC end of June. > > Regards > JB > > Le 18 mai 2021 à 16:48, COURTAULT Francois > <francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com > <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com><mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com > <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>>> a écrit : > > Hello, > > The question to be answered is in the Subject. > > Best Regards.