The router is on default namespace but the service pods are running on a
different namespace.

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Julio Saura <jsa...@hiberus.com> wrote:

> seems your router is running on default namespace, your pods are also
> running on namespace default?
>
>
> El 3 mar 2016, a las 7:58, Dean Peterson <peterson.d...@gmail.com>
> escribió:
>
> I did do an "oc edit scc privileged" and made sure this was at the end:
>
> users:
> - system:serviceaccount:openshift-infra:build-controller
> - system:serviceaccount:management-infra:management-admin
> - system:serviceaccount:default:router
> - system:serviceaccount:default:registry
>
> router has always been a privileged user service account.
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Ram Ranganathan <rrang...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> So you have no app level backends in that gist (haproxy.config file).
>> That would explain the 503s - there's nothing there for haproxy to route
>> to.  Most likely its due to the router service account has no permissions
>> to get the routes/endpoints info from etcd.
>> Check that the router service account (router default or whatever service
>> account you used to start the router) is
>> part of the privileged SCC and has read permissions to etcd.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Dean Peterson <peterson.d...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I created a public gist from the output:
>>> https://gist.github.com/deanpeterson/76aa9abf2c7fa182b56c
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Ram Ranganathan <rrang...@redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You shouldn't need to restart the router. It should have created a new
>>>> deployment and redeployed the router.
>>>> So looks like the cause for your 503 errors is something else.
>>>>
>>>> Can you check that your haproxy.config file is correct (has the correct
>>>> backends and servers).
>>>> Either nsenter into your router docker container and cat the file or
>>>> then run:
>>>>     oc exec <router-pod-name> cat /var/lib/haproxy/conf/haproxy.config
>>>>    #  router-pod-name as shown in oc get pods
>>>>
>>>> Ram//
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Dean Peterson <peterson.d...@gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I ran that "oc env dc router RELOAD_INTERVAL=5s" but I still get the
>>>>> 503 error.  Do I need to restart anything?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Ram Ranganathan <rrang...@redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dean, we did have a recent change to coalesce router reloads (default
>>>>>> is 0s) and it looks like with that default we are more aggressive with 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> reloads which could be causing this problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please try setting an environment variable ala:
>>>>>>     oc env dc router RELOAD_INTERVAL=5s
>>>>>>        #  or even 2s or 3s  - that's reload interval in seconds btw
>>>>>>        # if you have a custom deployment config then replace the dc
>>>>>> name router to that deployment config name.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and see if that helps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Dean Peterson <
>>>>>> peterson.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there another place I can look to track down the problem?  The
>>>>>>> router logs don't say much, just: " Router is including routes in
>>>>>>> all namespaces"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Dean Peterson <
>>>>>>> peterson.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All it says is: " Router is including routes in all namespaces"
>>>>>>>>  That's it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Clayton Coleman <
>>>>>>>> ccole...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What do the router logs say?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 2, 2016, at 7:43 PM, Dean Peterson <peterson.d...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is as close to having openshift origin set up perfectly as I
>>>>>>>>> have gotten.  My builds work great, container deployments always work 
>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>> I thought I was finally going to have a smooth running Openshift; I 
>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>> need to get past this last router issue.  It makes little sense.  I 
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> set up a router many times before and never had this issue.  I've had
>>>>>>>>> issues with other parts of the system but never the router.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Dean Peterson <
>>>>>>>>> peterson.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have a number of happy pods.  They are all running normally.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Mohamed Lrhazi <
>>>>>>>>>> mohamed.lrh...@georgetown.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Click on a pod and get to its log and events tabs.... see if
>>>>>>>>>>> they are actually happy or stuck on something...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Dean Peterson <
>>>>>>>>>>> peterson.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have successfully started the ha proxy router.  I have a pod
>>>>>>>>>>>> running, yet all my routes take me to a 503 service unavailable 
>>>>>>>>>>>> error
>>>>>>>>>>>> page.  I updated my resolv.conf file to have my master ip as 
>>>>>>>>>>>> nameserver;
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've never had this problem on previous versions.  I installed 
>>>>>>>>>>>> openshift
>>>>>>>>>>>> origin 1.1.3 with ansible; everything seems to be running smoothly 
>>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>> before but I just get 503 service unavailable errors trying to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> visit any
>>>>>>>>>>>> route.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>>> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
>>>>>>> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ram//
>>>>>> main(O,s){s=--O;10<putchar(3^O?97-(15&7183>>4*s)*(O++?-1:1):10)&&\
>>>>>> main(++O,s++);}
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ram//
>>>> main(O,s){s=--O;10<putchar(3^O?97-(15&7183>>4*s)*(O++?-1:1):10)&&\
>>>> main(++O,s++);}
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ram//
>> main(O,s){s=--O;10<putchar(3^O?97-(15&7183>>4*s)*(O++?-1:1):10)&&\
>> main(++O,s++);}
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users

Reply via email to