Hi, Im sorry, yet again. You are abseloutly right. I was switching between SER and OpenSER (and of-cource two separate databases) on the same plattform, and it turned out that the timers generated a 408 right after I declined the call. I did not realize that I had one more contact in usrloc aswell. Hence, the 603 was absorbed correctly and a 408 generated for the second contact..
...much ado about nothing...sorry about that. best regards, hw On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 00:44 +0200, Klaus Darilion wrote: > is the 408 immediately sent after the 603 or after a timeout? > Maybe there was another branch which timed out. > > klaus > > Helge Waastad wrote: > > > Sorry, > > not 403, but 408......it's a litle bit late right now.....at least for > > me... > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Subject: > > 603 to 403 > > From: > > Helge Waastad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: > > Wed, 07 Sep 2005 22:23:19 +0200 > > To: > > users@openser.org > > > > To: > > users@openser.org > > > > > > Hi, > > I noticed that when a client declines a call (603) it is forwarded out > > as an 403 from openser....I belive this is something that was fixed in > > the SER-0.9.4....(?) > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > Users@openser.org > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users -- mvh/best regards Helge Waastad System Engineer Smartnet (+47)67830017 _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users