----- Original Message ----- > From: "Frantisek Kobzik" <fkob...@redhat.com> > To: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> > Cc: "users" <users@ovirt.org> > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 12:08:58 PM > Subject: Re: [Users] SpiceHTML5, noVNC console and Spice Proxy mixable? > > Hi, > > the answer to the 1st question is 'yes'. You can use both SPICE-HTML5 and > noVNC with a single proxy setup. > > Coming to next questions: > - is it mixable with the two above or are they mutually exclusive? > - IMHO it should work. the data flow would look like this: > client <--> websocket proxy <--> spice proxy <--> VM > I'm not sure if this is what you want.
I am unsure spice-html5 supports spice proxy[1], and it is not required as websocket protocol is http already. Gianluca, the engine-setup of 3.3.1 will setup the spice proxy per default on the engine, it should be sufficient to what you need. [1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-html5/tree/spiceconn.js > - can I configure the engine itself to be the proxy, installing squid on it? > I cannot tell for sure, but IMHO it shouldn't be a problem. > - If yes, what would be correct parameter for SpiceProxyDefault (localhost > vs. fqdn): > I believe 'localhost' is wrong since this value is sent to the client. And > this client can misinterpret this value and try to connect to itself. In > short, the spice proxy value should be correctly resolvable from client > machines. > > (Adding Tomas to verify the last answer.) > > Cheers, > Frank. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> > To: "users" <users@ovirt.org> > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 4:15:38 PM > Subject: [Users] SpiceHTML5, noVNC console and Spice Proxy mixable? > > Hello, > I already have a thread regarding SpiceHTML5 open and where I'm going > to give further feedback as requested. > In the mean time I would like to ask if the three features in the > subject are completely mixable or not, as in the next days I'm going > to test them all and I would like to start from consistent setup and > not to give wrong answers based on wrong initial setup. > > If I understood correctly, both SpiceHTML5 and noVNC console are based > on websocket proxy through the config parameter called WebSocketProxy > and I can consolidate this proxy on the engine. SO that I can in the > same environment use both. > Correct? > > Coming then to Spice Proxy, managed by config parameter > "SpiceProxyDefault", my questions are: > - is it mixable with the two above or are they mutually exclusive? > - can I configure the engine itself to be the proxy, installing squid on it? > - If yes, what would be correct parameter for SpiceProxyDefault: > localhost:3128 or engine_hostname.domainname:3128? > If both are ok, I think it is more convenient to use localhost, correct? > > Thanks in advance, > Gianluca > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users