mouss wrote: > as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has > valid DKIM sigs.
Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature. > the sample posted by Michelle came to her via a debian list. debian > lists are open (no subscription required) and thus attract a lot of > spam. And whilst invitations such as those broadcasted are annoying, they're not _really_ spam, are they? /Per Jessen, Zürich
