> I am worried about PTRACE_SYSEMU, I continue to ignore this magic > which I don't understand yet... Hopefully I will be able to add the > necessary changes later.
It should not be a big complexity. The semantics is that the entry report always does like UTRACE_SYSCALL_ABORT to skip the actual call, and then there is no exit report. (Since ptrace doesn't distinguish entry and exit reports, you can make the actual stop and report happen either in the entry spot or the exit spot, whatever is easiest in the implementation.) Thanks, Roland
