On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:23:07 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 10/06, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > but it does not break stopped-attach-transparency for me. > > You mean, it doesn't fix stopped-attach-transparency?
Oh I may have been testing attach-into-signal instead, OK, forget about my bogus kernel test. Anyway stopped-attach-transparency makes no sense to test when detach-stopped is still FAILing. stopped-attach-transparency is much more complicated based on the fundamental functionality tested by detach-stopped. After you recommend a kernel/patch for PASSing detach-stopped we can start talking about stopped-attach-transparency. Thanks, Jan