Tom wrote:
> I suppose we are talking on the "linebreak, showbreak, and visual > block yank problem" topic which was discussed in the other thread. The > patch I sent turned out to be incorrect - as per the explanation given > by Christian (see the "Visual block mode delete and a "linebreaked" > space" discussion). It breaks "test_listlbr" test. I started to work > on an impreved version. Unfortunately, the thing turned out to be > quite a lot more complicated. Changing output of block_prep() means to > change handler functions of every type of block op, not just yank or > delete. If I ever happen to get it right I'll get back to you. I hope Christian can help out, since he implemented 'linebreak'. -- The 50-50-90 rule: Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong. /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
