At 9:16 AM -0500 10/11/02, Craig A. Berry wrote:
>David Webb wrote:
>>Craig and Attila,
>>
>>Would it be OK for me to post your two replies to the Spamassassin
>>developers.
>
>Fine by me. I think the use of fork() in spamd may be the biggest
>problem. If it could be rewritten to use ithreads that might work,
>though we might need Perl 5.8.0 to do those reliably.
You can run spamassassin without using spamd, though it's rather
expensive to do so. (I ran it that way myself for quite a while on my
mail machine, but switched over to the spamd form because of the
expense and time it took)
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
