I wonder why the article ignores the fact that deuterium is the only
energy source that is in sufficient amount with a sufficiently high
energy density? What does it take to make this fact part of government
policy? Even the hot fusion program, as poor a method as it is,
receives little support and, as we know, cold fusion is actively
ignored. This is rather like people on a sinking ship ignoring the life
boat because it is not painted with their favorite color.
Ed
Terry Blanton wrote:
This article says that the Canadian Sands won't save us because you
can't squeeze it out fast enough:
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com