Axil-- I just ran into the following item concerning entanglement and Cooper pair identification---
http://phys.org/news/2010-01-solid-case-entanglement.html#nRlv It addresses the recent comments on Vortex about entanglement in various solid state systems, including semiconductors. Here’s another item on spin entangled electrons—my favorite subject. http://phys.org/news/2015-07-spin-entangled-electrons.html#inlRlv Bob Cook From: Axil Axil Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 12:13 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Resonance in a ceramic tube reactor I posted on this http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/28/the-fine-tuning-argument-axil-axil/ The fine tuning argument. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:47 PM, AlanG <a...@magicsound.us> wrote: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/article/68/6/10.1063/PT.3.2804 On 6/24/2015 8:09 AM, Bob Cook wrote: Jones-- From: Jones Beene Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 5:38 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: Resonance in a ceramic tube reactor Jones-- I think you are on the right track. We need a good description of the make up of protons and the cause of their mass conversion. Philippe Hatt, a Belgian physicist has proposed such a model. Electrons and positrons, which change their mass, are the constituents of protons , neutrons etc. His theory is set forth at h is web page. As I recall 18 electrons/positrons are involved in the makeup of the protone. He is able to predict rest mass accurately, as well as magnetic properties. The following is a link: www.phatt.com/unifyingtheory www.phatt.com/combindingenergy I identified these papers on Vortex on April 26,2015. Bob Cook From: Bob Cook Ø Ø Spin flipping may be a coupling mechanism to create phonic vibrations and heat. However what is the source of energy causing the spin flipping? …You suggest it may be gluon mass loss. I would agree… Bob - To be a little more specific, a few months ago I was struggling to frame a hypothesis called RPF. It proposes that protons vary in mass around an average – and can transfer some of their mass to spin energy via inelastic collisions that result in the temporary binding of two protons. This could be coincident with the Lamb shift. Proton mass is not quantized (nor is quark mass). Reversible Proton Fusion is a version of the diproton reaction, modified for condensed matter instead of a gravity field. The solar version is the most common nuclear reaction in the Universe, yet there is no permanent transmutation to helium, most of the time. For every actual fusion even, there are at least 10^20 reversals, back to protons (failed fusions but NOT elastic collisions). The diproton reaction itself may produce energy in the Sun without permanent fusion, but with mass converting to energy. LENR provides a substitute gravity field in lattice confinement. When transposed to LENR, a similar diproton reaction seldom goes into beta decay to form deuterons. Instead, energy is depleted from proton mass as spin, and deposited in magnons as spin, via the Lamb shift, which is spin-flipping. The energy of protons is regauged by QCD color charge during the brief instant of a binding event - which may occur only once in a large number of spin-flips. A tiny bit of mass of the proton (which probably gluons mass, instead of quarks) is converted into energy. The average proton can give up at least 7 parts per million of its net mass and retain its identity, but that small mass depletion is huge– compared to chemical energy. Essentially this would be the hypothetical mechanism whereby Lamb Shift can produce net spin energy in magnons, which materializes as heat. It is a conversion of mass to spin energy without transmutation, on the bottom line. Magnons are the intermediary. Occasionally there is a full fusion, which is why a small amount of radiation can be seen in LENR but it is thousands of times too low to account for the heat.
