On 9 November 2015 at 18:17, Bill Spitzak <spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Making the transform into a bitfield allows bitfield tests for useful facts: > it can see if it is a mirror image by testing the flip bit, and check for > transposition of the axes by checking the 90 degree bit. I believe this is > the reason behind the desire to declare it a bitfield and I agree this is > nice to have. > > I really do not see the problem with allowing it to be an int argument as > long as the enum value 2^31 is not used. Though I am also stumped as to why > you can't change the current misused ints into uint in the protocol. It will > not change the bit layout in the messages and therefore is not a protocol > change.
I don't really know what to do with this final claim. I like the idea, and it makes sense. Finally, it will solve this issue and potentially future ones as well. Is there any chance it could be implemented or is it a crazy idea? _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
