On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 22:23:59 +0100, Mark de Wever <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:34:44PM +0100, Guillaume Melquiond wrote: > > On 2009/2/8, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > GCC 4.4 landed in rawhide yesterday and I just tried building it using the > > > autotools build stuff. > > > > > ai.cpp:1905: error: dereferencing pointer '<anonymous>' does break > > > strict-aliasing rules > > > /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.4.0/../../../../include/c++/4.4.0/bits/stl_tree.h:259: > > > note: initialized from here > > > > That being said, I'm all for being proactive and supporting > > soon-to-be-released compilers. > > I also agree that we should fix compiler warnings. Especially on gcc, > since we made most compiler warnings fatal for gcc. I really like to > support 4.4 already, (in fact I already applied a debian patch for 4.4 a > while ago). > > I didn't look into the warning so don't know whether or not it's a valid > warning.
I'll file a bug soon against gcc in Fedora. (After waiting to see if the new version that will show in tomorrow's rawhide still has the problem.) Test rebuild's in Fedora have already turned up a number of bugs in gcc, and the feature owner has been working to get them fixed. _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
