On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Seth Fowler <s...@mozilla.com> wrote: >> I wanted to get the opinion of this list on how image-orientation and the >> <img> element’s naturalWidth and naturalHeight properties should interact. > > I thought there was some agreement that image-orientation ought to be > a markup feature as it affects the semantics of the image (or perhaps > investigate whether rotating automatically is feasible): > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25508
Yup, and thanks for linking the bug. If it happens at the markup level, it should *definitely* affect the naturalWidth/Height properties. I don't think that's in question at all. But nobody's moved on the markup issue, so I haven't removed the CSS property yet. ^_^ ~TJ