https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40892
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Werner <danwe...@web.de> 2012-10-11 10:10:15 UTC --- Thanks Timo, I think this behavior sounds reasonable. We probably should just start to separate our tests into several modules instead of having all of one extension in one module. Thinking about this further, by the nature of unit tests, it could make sense to change the handling there and tell resource loader that all those files are independent from each other or to register them in an alternative way from how they are registered now and let resource loader put them into different modules automatically. This could be a custom module type which will report to QUnit if a file can't be loaded. Does that sound reasonable at all? Anyhow, the later sounds like quite some work, not sure the nicer handling would be worth the effort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
