Wikipedia Review will make me feel right at home? You mean they'll address this issue which none of you Wikipedia administrators intend to, particularly David Gerard? What's the fucking point of you guys being administrators when you won't address important issues? Since when is it okay to speedy delete a new article re-created with the intentions of addressing all of Wikipedia's notability demands? You guys are running a reckless website and actually receive a deserved amount of negative press.
The article in question about journalist Alan Cabal: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_article Bill ________________________________ From: Charles Matthews <charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2009 4:23:02 PM Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Forum Bill Carter wrote: > Can you get Wikipedia Review to take up issue with the speedy deletion on > March 30th, 2009 of the re-created Alan Cabal article, which was followed by > a demented deletion review a day later I believe? Here's the article in > question about journalist Alan Cabal: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_article > > It looks to me to be a fucking notable article with plenty of citations. > > Mosey over there. They'll make you feel right at home. Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
