Bill Carter schreef: > For everyone else, take my angry diatribes seriously and verify the > accusations I am making. the article with 40 citations that was speedy > deleted remains here: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_article
The article is excellently referenced, but it just fails to make me care. Why is this journalist more interesting than others? What makes him notable? Give us a reason why he should have an article. I'm as inclusionist as no other, but this article doesn't show me in any way how Alan Cabal is different from his colleagues, who don't get an article. (And don't post it to the list: edit the article to make it clear why it should be returned to the encyclopedia.) Eugene _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
